The newest affront to the administration of justice has come from the choice within the E. Jean Carroll “fantasy” trial, the place a girl who seems to be obsessive about intercourse has gained a staggering $83.3 million verdict in opposition to Donald Trump for an alleged defamation for denying her declare that he had raped her at a Bergdorf Goodman retailer, the place she can’t even bear in mind the yr of its incidence. A lady who has been raped (absent roofies) is not going to ony bear in mind the yr however the month, the week, the day and even the minute the transgression came about.
And in Georgia, the sanctimonious DA Fani Willis, who threatened to fireside anybody working for her who slept with a coworker, seems to have been indulging a lavish affair together with her married lover, whom she has chosen to prosecute Donald Trump in a fancy RICO case with 19 defendants, when he was inexperienced at litigation and had not experience with such a legislation. These circumstances seem to manifest TDS (“Trump Derangement Syndrome”) by zealous Democrats wanting to tarnish or destroy the repute of the one-man wrecking ball they despise to the core.
Way more critical, nevertheless, are acts by the Supreme Court docket of the US, which have been manifest most severely in the present choice concerning the proper of the Biden administration to curtail the Governor of Texas in his efforts to staunch the flood of hundreds of thousands of unlawful migrants throughout our Southern Border, the place the President of the US has abdicated his function to make sure that the legal guidelines are faithfully executed and that the federal authorities will defend the states from invasions. Abbott is doing what Biden refuses to do in defending the state–but SCOTUS guidelines in opposition to him!
Whereas the Carroll and Willis circumstances could also be seen as laughing issues (demonstrating the extent to which one get together will go after their most influential political opponent), the border matter represents a menace to the integrity of the nation, the place at the least 25 different governors have now sided with Governor Abbott and we seem like on the verge of a Constitutional disaster. Whereas there’s discuss of a civil struggle between the states, this growth has to do with the legitimacy of the federal authorities and has extra of the character of a revolution of the type envisioned by the Declaration of Independence.
And this isn’t the primary time that SCOTUS has failed the nation. Within the wake of the (clearly fraudulent) election of 2020 (the place,, by my greatest estimate, Trump earned over 100,000,000 votes and Biden round 37,000,000), the rejection of the (as soon as once more) Texas lawsuit in opposition to the swing levels of Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania for violating their very own state protocols for the choice of electors on the specious grounds of “lack of standing” was not solely an enormous insult to the nation however positioned our future in jeopardy by allowing an illegitimate regime.
Not like the New York and Georgia offenses, these two are huge circumstances fraught with penalties for the nation. They concern the integrity of the federal election course of and the safety of our nation’s borders. One other case No. 21-7916 (far much less acquainted however which I delivered to the Supreme Court docket) underscores the whole irresponsibility and abdication of dedication of SCOTUS–at the least, in the event you imagine as I imagine that our seventh Modification proper to trial by jury could also be our most necessary (by safeguarding the individuals from lack of life, liberty, or property with out due course of).
SGT REPORT: By no means Communicate of This (28 December 2023)
The Courts of Wisconsin disadvantaged me of my proper to a trial by jury by claiming that there have been no disputed information, which was an final result manufactured by the Circuit Court docket merely setting apart the mass of information I had offered on the bottom that they have been “unreasonable”. The case arose out of a go well with for defamation over my declaration {that a} loss of life certificates for a purported Sandy Hook sufferer (Noah Pozner), which had no file quantity and neither state nor city certification) was pretend, the place I launched the experiences of two forensic doc consultants on my behalf.
After my Petition for a Writ was denied, I persevered and submitted a Petition for Rehearing, which was additionally denied. What could escape the attention, nevertheless, is that the supporting appendices (Appendix A-D and Appendix E) weren’t made accessible to the general public, the place a notice was added to the Petition, “Further materials from this submitting is obtainable within the Clerk’s Workplace”. If that strikes you as unusual, do you have to check out their contents you’ll instantly discern why they needed to be suppressed.
They embrace the FEMA handbook for the “mass casualty train involving kids” held at Sandy Hook on 13-14 December 2012, the CT FEMA Schedule exhibiting the drill to be performed on that date, a Crime Scene Investigation van within the car parking zone (when the home windows of Classroom 10 should not but damaged), and the affidavit of a Texas-licensed P.I., who accessed the recordsdata of the CT State Police and located proof not solely that there had been no mass homicide however that it was not even an working faculty.
In 2015, I introduced collectively 13 consultants on Sandy Hook (together with 6 Ph.D.s) and we decided that the college had been closed since 2008, that there have been no college students or academics there, and that it had been a FEMA train offered as mass homicide to advertise gun management. The e book we printed was banned by amazon.com lower than a month after it had gone on sale and had bought near 500 copies. So I launched it to the general public totally free as a PDF–nevertheless it was taken as a consequence of the lawsuit.
So the e book was banned by amazon.com and brought via a lawsuit, which was carried out (from each perspective I can deliver to bear) utterly improperly by setting apart my proof as “unreasonable”–which continues to deprive the residents of WI their proper to due course of underneath the seventh Modification. No person appears to care–most actually not the Supreme Court docket of the US. However my analysis has continued, together with communication with contributors within the occasion that our courts are not looking for you to know. Not even SCOTUS stands up for our Constitutional rights.
Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus on the Duluth Campus of the College of Minnesota and now resides in Wisconsin.
