I noticed this clip going round on social media of Jewish Homeland Safety chief Alejandro Mayorkas Holo-splaining gay Senator Josh Hawley, a person who engages in acts akin to rimming and fisting with males:
🇺🇸 America’s Jewish Secretary of Homeland Safety Alejandro Mayorkas will get challenged on his open border insurance policies.
You will by no means guess what card he performs subsequent. pic.twitter.com/U9g7YGkC5c
— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) February 3, 2024
Keith Woods is kin, I assume he didn’t see the context, however this tweet is incorrect. He was not being challenged on his open borders insurance policies. In actual fact, it was really the alternative – Hawley was demanding extra immigration.
The total clip is unimaginable. Truthfully, I don’t wish to spoil it by describing it earlier than you watch it. Right here it’s from C-SPAN (I hope this embed works for everybody):
Hawley brings out a big board displaying a tweet from a DHS worker who stated destructive issues about Israel and confirmed help for Palestine, and Hawley retains asking again and again if she was fired, demanding she be fired.
Then – you most likely received’t even consider this, which is why I advised you to look at the clip first – Hawley begins saying that the girl may have denied asylum to a Jewish asylum seeker making an attempt to flee persecution by Hamas.
Significantly. He asks over and over “DID SHE DENY AN ASYLUM CLAIM FROM A JEW TRYING TO ESCAPE PERSECUTION???”
Hawley has turn out to be the one most excessive Jew-lover I’ve ever seen. I don’t assume anybody compares to this. Lindsey Graham doesn’t even come shut. Hawley is extra aggressive about Israel than Ben Shapiro. He will get extremely emotional, frankly unhinged, and begins screaming concerning the oppression of the Jews. He additionally referred to as for shutting down the web to cease criticism of the Jews by People. He must be arrested for espionage, working for a overseas authorities to aim to undermine the American state. It’s probably the most outrageous factor I’ve ever seen.
After 5 minutes of those weird assaults, Mayorkas lastly stated the “my complete household was killed by Adolf Hitler” factor, however he stated it in response to accusations by Hawley that he was working to oppress the Jews. I don’t even know if Mayorkas may be blamed for that.
If the clip had been what it’s labeled as within the tweet, whining concerning the Holocaust in response to a query concerning the open border, it could not be surprising in any respect, and I wouldn’t put it previous him. However within the context of what really occurred, it’s one thing a lot totally different.
Additional: I’m about six million occasions extra outraged by white individuals who declare to help America supporting the sickening Jewish mass homicide marketing campaign in Gaza than I’m by Jews whining concerning the Holocaust. Jews are gonna Jew, it’s what it’s, however these folks within the authorities are purported to be defending our nation, and as a substitute they promote the pursuits of a overseas nation.
Josh Hawley is thought for this idiotic and faggoty emotional outbursts throughout hearings (many politicians do that now for social media clout, turning the entire thing right into a dumb circus), however I’ve by no means as soon as seen him get this upset about any American downside.
I used to be really shocked to see him calling for mass censorship on the web within the wake of October 7.
See: Cocksucking Faggot Josh Hawley Requires Mass Web Censorship to Defend Jew Emotions
It’s possible you’ll recall that his complete schtick was preventing web censorship. That’s what put him on the radar of most American right-wingers. Frankly, I favored what he was saying about arising with a method to forestall this mass censorship (though I all the time stated I don’t belief him, he’s clearly and clearly a gay, and his face is gross).
He’s now gone full censorship, within the identify of the Jews. He went from being the anti-censorship man within the Senate, to being probably the most aggressive advocate. His statements about TikTok had been indistinguishable from these of “Nikki Haley.”
What’s extra, he’s now pushing for censorship exterior of the context of the Jews. As a result of, after all, any “in” for censorship permits them to censor something they need.
The Senate final week did a “Huge Tech and the On-line Baby Sexual Exploitation Disaster” listening to, the place Zuckerberg and others had been referred to as in to be berated for not monitoring each single put up of their web sites which have tons of of tens of millions of readers, with Senators claiming that these firms must be monitoring each personal message so an older man can’t ship a horny message to an underage lady.
Hawley did yet one more one in all these ultra-emotional childlike outrage performances, screaming at Zuck like a drunken Vietnam vet recalling the time he by accident shot a toddler.
He additionally attacked the Chinese language man from TikTok.
The World Socialist Web site (which I learn, and customarily like, as foolish as that may sound) did an excellent evaluate.
Kevin Reed wrote:
In a stage-managed alternate, Hawley repeatedly questioned Mark Zuckerberg, interrupted him after which demanded that the Meta CEO apologize to the households of kids harmed by on-line sexual abuse, a few of whom had been sitting behind him within the viewers on the listening to.Hawley then went into an anticommunist and anti-Chinese language tirade towards TikTok’s Chew, accusing him of being an agent of a overseas hostile authorities and calling for the banning of the app in the USA. Hawley’s costs towards TikTok are based mostly on persevering with unproven claims that person information on the platform is being queried, analyzed and used to spy on the American public by the Chinese language Communist Get together.
How information on the music and video preferences of youngsters and pre-teens would support the Chinese language authorities in a world battle with the USA isn’t defined by the authors of such costs.
That’s my speaking level!
The socialists won’t agree with this, however these for revenue firms don’t have a duty to do morality. Firms have a fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders to make as a lot cash as potential, interval. It’s no more difficult than that. Clearly, they need to observe the legal guidelines, but when they’re not breaking the regulation, and the federal government doesn’t like what they’re doing, the federal government wants to alter the legal guidelines.
Hawley says “your job is to be accountable for what your organization has finished,” which isn’t remotely true, and violates the fundamentals of the free market system.
Pfizer for instance clearly engaged in crimes by working with regulators to lie concerning the security of the vaccines, which the federal government then coerced folks into taking (together with by an unlawful censorship program, which each Musk and Zuck blew the whistle on). Fb is just not doing that. They’re only a web site that individuals can use or not, and Part 230 explicitly says that as a platform, they don’t seem to be accountable for the content material that customers put up.
Zuck got here throughout wanting so recent and so clear, clear after these wacky assaults. And admittedly, he didn’t even do something incorrect. He didn’t even do the censorship, he was ordered by the federal government by secret FBI channels. That is totally different from Elon Musk, who does apology excursions in Israel and Poland saying he desires to censor way more.
Individuals wish to be towards Zuck as a result of he’s wealthy and Jewish and Fb is rubbish and so forth, however he hasn’t actually finished something incorrect. Once more, his job is to become profitable. Fb is a public firm. With out breaking the regulation, he’s purported to do no matter he can to make as a lot cash as potential. Failing to observe each message on the location to ensure somebody isn’t flirting with a teenage lady is just not breaking the regulation. He’s additionally not legally obligated to do analysis on how social media use is affecting folks’s psychological well being.
At one level, Hawley stated “you probably did it for cash!” and it’s like bro, what even is that this? In fact he did it for cash. He runs a for-profit firm. That’s his job. He can get sued if he doesn’t do it.
Once more, I simply wish to stress: Hawley is in search of any motive to censor the web as a result of he desires to have the ability to censor content material crucial of Jews, as he has overtly said. This “received’t somebody please consider the kids” factor is actually a meme from the Simpsons, 30 years in the past.
