Two out of three. That’s what I believe most individuals would get. Strive it for your self: What have been the three ominous slogans on the coronary heart of George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-4 (1949)? Two of them are punchy and simple to recollect: WAR IS PEACE and FREEDOM IS SLAVERY. However what’s the third? It’s the unmemorable IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH. That third slogan simply doesn’t work. It isn’t punchy and it doesn’t condense and seize the ideology of the ruling celebration like the primary two. Orwell may have achieved a lot better than that.
“Rigorously constructed lies”
So what ought to he have used as a substitute? I counsel: DEMOCRACY IS TYRANNY. That’s punchy and perverse like the primary two slogans. It captures the ideology of the ruling celebration and a very powerful idea within the novel. Right here’s the novel’s protagonist musing on that idea:
Winston sank his arms to his sides and slowly refilled his lungs with air. His thoughts slid away into the labyrinthine world of doublethink. To know and to not know, to take heed to full truthfulness whereas telling fastidiously constructed lies, to carry concurrently two opinions which cancelled out, figuring out them to be contradictory and believing in each of them, to make use of logic towards logic, to repudiate morality whereas laying declare to it, to imagine that democracy was inconceivable and that the Celebration was the guardian of democracy, to neglect no matter it was essential to neglect, then to attract it again into reminiscence once more for the time being when it was wanted, after which promptly to neglect it once more: and above all, to use the identical course of to the method itself. That was the last word subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, after which, as soon as once more, to change into unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had simply carried out. (Nineteen Eighty-4, Half 1, chapter 3)
Doublethink guidelines the trendy West, as a result of doublethink is on the coronary heart of leftism and leftism controls each facet of cultural and political life within the fashionable West. For instance, race relations are ruled by two contradictory ideas: first, that every one racial teams are equal in each means; second, that Whites are innately villainous and non-Whites innately virtuous. If non-Whites like Blacks fail within the West, it’s due to White racism. If non-Whites like Indians succeed, it’s regardless of White racism. Leftists preach equality and practise hierarchy. These on the high of the leftist hierarchy, like non-Whites and homosexuals, are privileged over these on the backside, like Whites and straights.
Boasting about betrayal
This explains why, in leftist eyes, transgenderism is sacred and transracialism is sickening. The male perverts who absurdly declare to be ladies are on the high of the hierarchy, which is why the left agrees with their claims and condemns all opposition as bigoted, hateful, and “transphobic.” However the Whites who declare with no extra absurdity to be Black are on the backside of the hierarchy, which is why the left rejects their claims with contempt. It’s additionally why leftists forbid White actors to take non-White roles, however applaud when non-White actors take White roles, from Achilles to David Copperfield, from Guinevere to Anne Boleyn. On the one hand, sure, all races are fully equal, however then again Whites are demons and non-Whites are saints. That’s doublethink. And it implies that a superior group can invade and occupy the territory of an inferior group. Perverted males can change into “transwomen” and civilization-wrecking non-Whites can change into what I name “trans-Westerners.” Neither the perverted males nor the civilization-wrecking non-Whites have a real declare to the identification bestowed on them by the left, however that’s exactly why the left bestows it on them.
Saintly non-Whites invade and occupy White territory: all White roles are open to non-Whites, however no non-White position is open to Whites.
It’s additionally why bizarre Whites are allowed completely no say on migration. Decade after decade, the political elite have postured about “democracy” while ignoring the crystal-clear message of the White majority: “We don’t need non-White migration.” As I identified in “Working-Class Zero,” politicians within the so-called Labour celebration have overtly boasted about betraying their supporters within the White working-class. That is Roy Hattersley, the previous deputy chief of the Labour Celebration, addressing his fellow doublethinkers within the Guardian:
How are politicians to behave when, having listened, they discover themselves in basic disagreement with what they’ve heard? Ought to I, in 1964, have known as for what a transparent majority of my constituents, and a lot of the nation, undoubtedly needed: the repatriation of all Commonwealth [i.e., non-White] immigrants? [His answer: “Not in a million years.”] (Politics needs to be guided by ideas, not populism, The Guardian, fifth Could 2013) … For many of my 33 years in Westminster, I used to be ready to withstand Sparkbrook’s calls for in regards to the nice problems with nationwide coverage — in any other case, my first decade would have been spent opposing all Commonwealth immigration and my final calling for withdrawal from the European Union. (Ideology’s our life, Esther, The Guardian, thirty first July 2013)
It’s no coincidence that Hattersley is now a wealthy man who sits within the Home of Lords as Baron Hattersley. In 2013, he married the lady chargeable for his wealth, the Jewish literary agent Maggie Pearlstine. The present Labour chief, Sir Keir Starmer, additionally has a Jewish spouse. When he turns into prime minister, as appears prone to occur very quickly, he’ll betray the White working-class simply as completely and enthusiastically as Roy Hattersley did. And he shall be simply as richly rewarded. The Conservative celebration can be led by traitors and doublethinkers. They posture about “democracy” and pour billions of kilos into defending the borders of Ukraine. On the similar time, they refuse to defend the borders of Britain, because the Telegraph’s Sam Ashworth-Hayes has identified in a wonderful article at Substack:
For 13 years and counting, the British voters has voted at each alternative given to it for immigration to return down. Politicians have solemnly nodded, pledged to ship reductions, and proceeded to design a system which noticed 745,000 individuals added to the UK’s inhabitants final 12 months.The query of “why” this occurred can wait for an additional time. At present’s level is a a lot easier one: there is no such thing as a political consent for this, the financial advantages are negligible, the cultural downsides should not, and it’s making Britain a worse nation to stay in. (“Our immigration system is making Britain a worse nation to stay in,” twenty sixth November 2023)
The identical is true of all different Western nations. America and Britain, France and Germany, Italy and Spain — they’re all being invaded by non-Whites from the world’s most violent, corrupt, and unproductive areas. These non-Whites will all the time eat much more in taxes than they contribute and can by no means excel at something however crime, corruption, and ethnic nepotism. The White majority have by no means needed this to occur and have voted towards it “at each alternative.” However the democracy-loving elites of all Western nations have simply as persistently ignored their votes. As Orwell ought to have written: DEMOCRACY IS TYRANNY.
Naming the Jew has been taboo
Sam Ashworth-Hayes says that the query of “why” the non-White invasion has occurred “can wait for an additional time.” Sadly, he can’t tackle that query truthfully, as a result of he’d lose his job and repute if he did so. And why has it occurred? It’s occurred as a result of the wealthy Jews who management Western politics have needed it to occur. Like America, Britain is a Judeocracy, not a democracy. That’s why the Conservative and Labour events are united on the necessity to defend the borders of Ukraine and to demolish the borders of Britain. It’s additionally why no-one within the mainstream can speak about Jewish management. Naming the Jew has been taboo.
However that taboo is starting to slide. Israel’s vicious conflict on Gaza is including to the strain on Clown World’s crumbling wall of lies. When the wall lastly collapses, Western politics shall be invaded by one thing the Clown-elite gained’t welcome in any respect: reality and racial actuality.
