(Bloomberg) — After coming below assault from each environmentalists and buyers within the first half of his seven-year tenure on the helm of Exxon Mobil Corp., Darren Woods is on the offensive.
Most Learn from Bloomberg
Already this yr, Woods filed an arbitration case in opposition to Chevron Corp. for trying to purchase into Exxon’s huge offshore oil venture in Guyana and a lawsuit in opposition to buyers demanding that his firm lower emissions. Simply months earlier, he agreed to a $60 billion takeover that might make Exxon the largest US shale producer.
Woods can also be changing into rather more strident about local weather targets in speeches and interviews, arguing that fossil fuels will nonetheless be wanted for years to come back to satisfy power demand and the world shouldn’t be on a path to net-zero carbon emissions by 2050 as a result of persons are unwilling to pay for cleaner options.
The message could also be controversial, but it surely’s resonating on Wall Road, the place “ESG” is quick changing into a loathed moniker as formidable environmental, social and governance pledges are rubbing in opposition to the necessity for safe and inexpensive power. Exxon is up 89%, greater than 4 occasions that of the S&P 500, since dropping a climate-fueled proxy battle with Engine No. 1. in 2021.
It’s a exceptional turnaround from the pandemic period, when Exxon posted its biggest-ever loss, workers have been leaving in droves and the shareholder riot pressured Woods to exchange 1 / 4 of his board. Exxon’s revival is emblematic of a resurgent American oil business, which is now pumping 40% extra crude every day than Saudi Arabia, forcing OPEC and its allies to retreat.
“It wasn’t that way back it seemed like taking the inexperienced method was what the business wanted to draw capital,” stated Jeff Wyll, a senior analyst at Neuberger Berman, which manages about $440 billion. However Russia’s invasion of Ukraine “flipped the swap and power safety grew to become extra necessary. Exxon benefited as a result of they by no means stepped again from their conventional enterprise.”
When Woods takes heart stage on the CERAWeek by S&P World power convention in Houston this week, he’s prone to double down on his long-held view that fossil fuels will likely be in demand for many years to come back and that governments and shoppers — slightly than Massive Oil — might want to pay for any significant transition to greener power.
For individuals who see Exxon and Massive Oil as accountable for a long time of delay and misinformation about local weather change, it’s an unpopular argument. Nevertheless it’s one constructed from a place of accelerating monetary power.
Exxon paid out $32 billion in dividends and buybacks in 2023, the fourth-highest within the S&P 500, and is pledging extra this yr. Its pending $60 billion acquisition of Pioneer Pure Sources Co. will make it the nation’s dominant producer of shale oil, placing it on the high of the business largely accountable for OPEC+ dropping market share to the US.
Exxon additionally operates one of many world’s fastest-growing main oil developments in Guyana, the largest crude discovery in a decade, and lately accomplished a raft of refinery and petrochemical expansions.
Its supermajor rivals at the moment are racing to catch up.
Chevron agreed to purchase Hess Corp. for $53 billion, largely to achieve a 30% stake in Exxon’s Guyana venture. However Exxon claims the deal “tried to avoid” a contract that provides it proper of first refusal over the stake, and is taking the dispute to arbitration on the Worldwide Chamber of Commerce in Paris.
Shell Plc and BP Plc, in the meantime, at the moment are switching extra of their funding {dollars} again towards oil and gasoline below new CEOs after their shares slumped following a pivot towards renewables.
The European supermajors’ struggles display the perils of changing excessive, regular money flows from fossil fuels with low-margin renewables, in accordance with Greg Buckley, a portfolio supervisor at Adams Funds who helps handle about $3.5 billion together with Exxon shares.
“ESG was common however I feel that return on capital is extra common on the finish of the day,” he stated. Shell and BP “came upon the onerous means.”
The shift away from ESG terminology is a recognition that the power transition will likely be complicated and will not unfold the identical means in each a part of the globe, Dan Yergin, the vice chairman of S&P World, which organizes the CERAWeek convention, stated in an interview. Conflicts all over the world, together with within the Center East and Ukraine, have underscored the necessity for dependable power provide, whereas buyers stay targeted on returns, he stated.
“The power corporations have demonstrated a self-discipline of their capital funding and have been attentive to buyers,” Yergin stated. “You possibly can see that of their spending and that is refurbished the social contract between the businesses and buyers.”
Woods can also be studying from his personal expertise with activist shareholders. In January, the corporate filed a lawsuit in opposition to US and Dutch local weather buyers who purchase inventory to push for decrease emissions. The method by which they get votes on the poll at firm conferences “has grow to be ripe for abuse by activists with minimal shares and little interest in rising long-term shareholder worth,” Exxon stated within the swimsuit.
Woods can also be being extra vocal about his views on a lower-carbon future. “The soiled secret no person talks about is how a lot all that is going to price and who’s keen to pay for it,” he stated in a latest Fortune podcast. The world “waited too lengthy” to think about all of the options wanted to cut back emissions.
The feedback invoked ire from environmentalists.
“It’s an infuriating little bit of rhetoric, particularly from Exxon as a result of they’re essentially the most related to the trouble to gradual progress on local weather change,” stated Andrew Logan, oil and gasoline senior director at CERES, a coalition of environmentally-minded buyers with $65 trillion below administration. “They’ve a protracted historical past of over-promising and below delivering on low carbon.”
Emily Mir, a spokeswoman for Exxon, pushed again at Logan’s feedback in a press release. The corporate has stated it’s pursuing greater than $20 billion in lower-emission investments from 2022 by 2027, along with its $4.9 billion acquisition of Denbury Inc., a deal that gave the oil big the biggest community of carbon dioxide pipelines within the US. These pipes will likely be key to capturing carbon from closely polluting amenities like refineries and chemical crops.
“Info that don’t align with ill-informed prejudice are sometimes infuriating,” Mir stated. “That doesn’t make them fallacious. Somebody wants to inform the reality about what it’s going to take to get to a net-zero future.”
In November, Woods tried to flip the script on a slogan from the long-running “ExxonKnew” environmental marketing campaign, which claims that firm executives downplayed warnings from their very own scientists because the Nineteen Seventies that carbon dioxide causes local weather change. Exxon has denied intentionally deceptive the general public on international warming.
“We’ve received the instruments, the talents, the dimensions — and the mental and monetary assets — to bend the curve on emissions,” he stated on the APEC CEO Summit 2023 in San Francisco. “That’s what Exxon Mobil is aware of.”
However the power transition nonetheless looms massive. Fears that oil demand will peak as quickly as 2030 have led buyers to low cost the power of Exxon and its friends to maintain dividends and buybacks because the transition takes maintain. The S&P 500 is now dominated by tech shares, whose earnings are seen as extra resilient for many years into the long run.
Even after its rally over the previous few years, Exxon is just the S&P 500’s seventeenth largest firm, buying and selling at 12.2 occasions earnings, 42% beneath the index’s common. Power shares make up lower than 4% of the index regardless of the US changing into the world’s greatest oil producer.
“Exxon and the business has but to make a case of how they may generate money in a carbon-constrained future,” Logan stated.
–With help from Naureen S Malik.
Most Learn from Bloomberg Businessweek
©2024 Bloomberg L.P.
