What follows is an interview performed by James Edwards with Filip Dewinter, a Member of the Flemish Parliament in Belgium.
James Edwards: You had been first elected to workplace in 1987, whenever you had been simply 25 years previous. Since 1995 you may have held a seat as a Member of the Flemish Parliament. What are your signature points?
Filip Dewinter: I feel it’s the responsibility of a politician to be controversial if they honestly need to make a distinction. Subjects like immigration, the rise of crime, and the deterioration of the welfare state are points which have all the time been the closest to my coronary heart. And sure, it’s not all the time straightforward to talk out about these delicate subjects as a result of when you do, the left-liberal media instantly manufacturers you as racist, fascist, or no matter advert hominem assault that’s in vogue on the time. Whoever talks about politically incorrect subjects is instantly branded because the unhealthy man. No matter what they name me, nonetheless, I proceed to talk up about what subjects I view to be most necessary.
Edwards: You’re a very well-known and unabashed advocate for the historic European majority in your nation, and also you cruise to reelection every time you’re challenged. How have you ever been in a position to flip your unapologetic pro-European positions right into a political asset?
Dewinter: We oppose mass immigration and the ideology that makes mass immigration attainable: multiculturalism. Because the opposition politicians, we’re the stick, the watchdog of democracy. We now have put many points on the political agenda: political corruption, asylum and migration, and preventing crime. After all, you by no means get credit score for that, however typically different events copy your views and run together with your success. My technology and I had been the icebreakers who needed to construct the trail with a decide and shovel. That meant that generally we needed to hit exhausting, provoke, and take fairly radical positions.
Edwards: Vlaams Belang, the political social gathering you may have lengthy been related to, is at present the most well-liked social gathering in Flanders, right?
Dewinter: Sure, proper now Vlaams Belang is at present polling in first place, between 25% and 30%. That stated, we nonetheless have some months to go till the election. It’s apparent, nonetheless, that our concepts have gotten mainstream. Our opponents, the previous, mainstream events, together with mainstream media, say that our concepts are excessive, provocative, and so forth. Perhaps it’s they who’ve grow to be excessive, and we’re the mainstream now! In spite of everything, how can a celebration be thought of excessive or radical when, out of all the opposite events, it enjoys probably the most public assist? It’s value noting that this phenomenon isn’t solely taking place in Flanders however in lots of different nations throughout Europe.
Edwards: Are you able to tackle the liberal-left idea of multiculturalism in Europe? What are the important values of the varied European nations and the way can Europeans be protected sooner or later?
Dewinter: For a lot of a long time, the progressive left has been attempting to drive multiculturalism upon us. By an open-borders coverage that facilitates mass immigration, they need to notice the “Nice Alternative.” Because of this the native European persons are changed by a melting pot of all types of cultures.
In apply, European cultures are disappearing and being changed by Islamic tradition. That can’t and should not be the intention.
Important to our European id is the range of the European individuals and their particular cultures. There’s a whole lot of range in Europe. Not the so-called multicultural range during which non-European civilizations are pressured upon us, however the actual range of “The Europe of 100 flags,” every representing a novel nation and folks.
We will solely protect our various European tradition, which is Christian and Western and is predicated on human rights and the values of the Enlightenment (free speech, democracy, equality between women and men, separation between church and state), if we additionally respect the cultures of the ethnic minorities in Europe.
Edwards: What are the principle threats to European identities and cultures?
Dewinter: The principle menace to our European tradition and definitely the smaller cultures is, in fact, the mass immigration pressured upon us by the EU and the globalist elite. The “Nice Alternative” is imminent. The native European persons are in peril of being changed by Third World individuals. And whoever brings within the Third World turns into the Third World.
All the pieces that has to do with id and cultural uniqueness should apparently be destroyed. Racism has grow to be a pretext to undo our European id and cultural uniqueness and exchange it with multiculturalism and the melting pot society. As all the time when socialism strives for equality, this implies a downward leveling. This cultural genocide should finish.
Edwards: You might have a brand new e-book out titled Repopulation: The Nice Alternative. Our opponents allege that it’s a “delusion” or a “conspiracy concept” to level out that the European populations are being changed of their homelands by others. What say you?
Dewinter: That is one more try to stifle debate. Stick the label “racist,” “fascist,” “anti-Semite,” or “conspiracy theorist” in your opponent and the controversy is closed. Anybody who has eyes of their head and isn’t multiculturally blind will discover that repopulation will not be a conspiracy concept, however a easy empirical statement that everybody makes whenever you stroll round any metropolis in Western Europe. You then see the repopulation round you, full cease.
Edwards: Why did you are feeling it essential to write down concerning the Nice Alternative?
Dewinter: I assumed it was essential to write down this e-book as a result of I don’t suppose the best hazard to our democracy and to our civilization is tyranny — it’s mass immigration. In case you actually have a look at the state of affairs at hand, the standard of life, the overburden on our welfare state, the rise of crime, and the standard of our training system, these points are inextricably linked to immigration. Subsequently, I feel that mass immigration, and naturally additionally the ideology that pushes for mass immigration, is the best menace.
If mass immigration continues at its present ranges for for much longer it will likely be the tip of our European civilization. Demographically, Europeans will stop to be politically, culturally, and economically related.
Edwards: In what methods is Islam incompatible with Western civilization?
Dewinter: It’s clear that Islamic ideology and Islamic tradition should not suitable with our Western lifestyle and our European tradition and civilization. We stand for the values of European civilization—freedom of speech, the separation of state and church, the equality between women and men, and democracy. We clearly want a revitalization of these values. In that regard, the rise of Muslim extremism has had one optimistic consequence: these fanatics have made us cease taking our traditions and cultural mores as a right.
Because of this, Europe is almost prepared to begin a civilizational ethical offensive, based mostly on the foundations of our greatness: Rome, Greece, Christianity, humanism, and the Enlightenment. These are the frequent European values that have to be promoted somewhat than the warped tenets of multiculturalism or the crude, dusty dogmas of Islamism.
Edwards: You wrote a earlier e-book Inch’Allah? The Islamization of Europe , which was translated into English. What is that this e-book all about?
Dewinter: Inch’Allah? is an account of radical Islam’s inroads into Europe. The e-book reveals the true nature of Islam which, not like different faiths, additionally includes a harmful totalitarian ideology, opposite to European freedoms, values, and requirements. Whereas Europeans are being lulled by multicultural indoctrination and propaganda, mass immigration serves as a Malicious program of Islam.
By way of a crafty ghetto technique, based mostly on the deliberate formation of Muslim enclaves in our cities, Islam seeks to ascertain bridgeheads from which the one true perception may be promulgated. Radical Islam has chosen the trail of conversion, infiltration, agitation, intimidation, and, if essential, violence. Left unchecked, the demographic, cultural, and navy jihad will completely remodel Europe into Eurabia.
The third Muslim invasion is in full swing, however the tide can nonetheless be turned. It isn’t too late to carry an finish to the Islamic colonization of Europe. Subsequently, as an alternative of embracing Islam and multiculturalism, Europe should pull itself collectively and cease the inflow of ever extra immigrants, halt the silent advance of Islam, and as an alternative have fun and propagate its personal priceless cultural id.
Edwards: Racism, xenophobia, Islamophobia — the accusations are all the time the identical. Those that are vital of immigration are instantly accused of being a racist. What’s your touch upon that?
Dewinter: At first, don’t forget that in Western Europe and virtually all main cities the inhabitants transition is already a reality. In Brussels, Paris, Amsterdam, London, and so many different massive cities, the unique native inhabitants has been changed by a combination of Third World individuals. The elected politicians in these cities and nations are subsequently indebted to those new voters with all the results that entails. They’re saying what these imported voters need to hear and attempt to outdo one another as one of the best and probably the most radical anti-racist.
Anti-racism and anti-discrimination are the brand new politically right buzzwords for witch-hunting and exorcism. Prior to now, alleged heretics and witches had been burned on the stake. Immediately, the identical is completed with so-called racists and patriots. As a politician, it is sufficient to be vital of immigration to be boycotted within the media, bombarded with lawsuits and authorized proceedings, and handled as a political pariah. Within the Center Ages, this additionally occurred to anybody who claimed that the Earth was not flat however spherical.
Edwards: What’s subsequent for Filip Dewinter?
Dewinter: Proceed my work as a politician on what’s necessary for the Western individuals, particularly defending our values and requirements for our personal individuals first.
This text was initially printed by American Free Press – America’s final actual newspaper! Click on right here to subscribe immediately or name 1-888-699-NEWS!