On the “Traditional Suspects” checklist we’ve got Ukraine and we’ve got ISIS. A very good case might be made for each. I’m posting three movies — a few of it’s repetitive — that discusses the assault and the very odd habits of the Biden Administration. Let’s undergo the chronology of occasions.
On March 7 US Embassy Moscow issued the next alert:
The Embassy is monitoring stories that extremists have imminent plans to focus on massive gatherings in Moscow, to incorporate concert events, and U.S. residents ought to be suggested to keep away from massive gatherings over the subsequent 48 hours.
What you’ll want to perceive is that this warning was not issued on the discretion of the embassy. This was accredited in Washington, DC at Primary State and would have required some intelligence that was deemed considerably particular and “credible.” Once I was doing this job at State Counter Terrorism in 1990, this was within the aftermath of the bombing of Pan, 103. It was broadly believed within the public that state division, and the CIA had data upfront concerning the terrorist bombing of that airplane, and warned our individual out to not get on board. That was not true however it did increase the difficulty of when, and methods to warn the general public a couple of potential menace. We got here up with a system that required particular and credible intelligence. The extra particular and credible the intelligence, the much less have to warn the general public. Contemplate, for instance, that if we knew a terrorist assault was going to be carried out on Friday at a public live performance corridor by a selected group, we’d be capable to alert acceptable authorities and take precautions to intercept the assault with out alarming the general public.
Then again, if the data was not in nice element, however did come from a reputable supply, then we’d take the time to place collectively a public warning. That’s what occurred when the US Embassy Moscow issued the warning on 7 March. They’d data they thought was credible, however not terribly particular. This raises a key query — did the USA warn Russian authorities? Usually, after I was doing the job, we’d share the data with the suitable authorities and regulation enforcement authorities, in an effort to attempt to stop the assault. Primarily based on public feedback by Maria Zakharova and Dimitri Medvedev, following the March 7, warning, and following at the moment’s assault, it seems that the USA didn’t share any of its data with Russia. I’d be aware there’s a Wall Avenue Journal report tonight, stating that the USA did warn, however Russian authorities insist that they weren’t supplied with an Intel heads up.
What makes your entire state of affairs so weird and questionable by way of what the USA knew, and when it knew it, is that the State Division issued an announcement inside two hours of the bombing — bear in mind, we nonetheless didn’t know what number of attackers, what sort of weapons, what number of casualties, and whether or not or not, they had been hostages — declaring that Ukraine was not accountable for this assault. How did State Division know that? It’s strongly means that the USA had intelligence, which didn’t share with Moscow.
Then we’ve got this very uncommon X message (previously Twitter) that was posted at 3:30 AM this morning, 22 March, by OSINTdefender (which I consider has a CIA entrance for spreading messages the CIA desires on the market):
Members of U.S. Nationwide Safety Council and the White Home have reportedly began to change into More and more Pissed off by “Unauthorized Brazen Actions” taken by Ukraine towards Russia, together with their current Marketing campaign of Lengthy-Vary Drone Strikes having Focused not less than 25 Oil Refineries, Terminals, Depots and Storage Amenities throughout Western Russia; with some Biden Administration Officers believing these Strikes will trigger a Spike in International Oil Costs in addition to Important Escalation and Retaliation towards Ukraine like was seen throughout tonight’s Massive-Scale Missile Assault.
Do you suppose that’s only a completely satisfied coincidence that the Biden White Home is bemoaning Ukraine taking “unauthorized brazen actions” on the identical day there’s a large terrorist assault in Moscow? I don’t imagine in coincidence. I believe the Biden ministration was attempting to get out forward of an assault that they knew was coming.
Some claims have emerged late within the day with ISIS, allegedly, taking credit score for the assault. What makes that fascinating is that we’ve got proof that some members of ISIS have been combating in Ukraine towards Russia, so this doesn’t essentially exonerate, both Ukraine or the USA.
Anyway, I take care of these points from totally different views within the following movies:
Right here’s the Decide and Ray:
And Nima:
