I neglect what yr it was that the New York Occasions ceased being a newspaper and have become a shill for the navy/safety complicated. Now the previous newspaper has teamed up with German conflict minister Boris Pistorius and two presstitutes to hype German rearmament to counter the Russian Risk. In one of many silliest articles I’ve ever learn, the NYT experiences that Pistorius is warning Germans to arrange for many years of confrontation with Russia and rapidly rebuild Germany’s navy “in case Vladimir V. Putin doesn’t plan to cease on the border with Ukraine.”
Let’s cease right here for a minute and keep in mind the Third Reich when Germany was a serious navy energy able to defeating Poland, France, and Nice Britain in a couple of weeks. Germans had been proud and extremely motivated, however confrontation with Russia introduced a fast finish to the Third Reich.
In distinction, immediately Germany is a deracinated state taught guilt and self-loathing by many years of American and Jewish management over German schooling and overrun with third world immigrant-invaders. Germany has been an American puppet state since 1945, and is being de-industrialized by American sanctions allegedly aimed toward Russia however hitting Germany. The notion that Germany could be able to confronting Russia militarily is hilarious.
Be aware the belief that “a newly aggressive Russia” may not cease with Ukraine. As Putin has made clear each with phrases and by how he has restricted Russian navy motion in Ukraine, Putin’s purpose is restricted to the earlier Russian territories that Soviet leaders positioned into the Ukrainian Soviet Republic. The Russian inhabitants in Ukraine was struggling persecution, and that’s the reason the Kremlin intervened.
Washington nonetheless thinks in nineteenth century phrases that energy is gained by the conquest of land. That’s not the way in which Russia and China suppose. For Russia and China affect is obtained by means of financial and monetary cooperation, not by occupying land or controlling governments. Washington and Israel are the one two militarily aggressive international locations on the earth.
The top of Germany’s intelligence service, Bruno Kahl, is even sillier than the conflict minister. Kahl mentioned, in response to the NYT, “If Ukraine had been pressured to give up, that will not fulfill Russia’s starvation for energy. If the West doesn’t reveal a transparent readiness to defend, Putin can have no cause to not assault NATO.”
Clearly, the chief of German intelligence, if it may be referred to as that, has no thought of the dynamics of energy.
Ukraine is defeated. Russia just isn’t pursuing its benefit. Putin is simply sitting there ready for the belief to soak in.
Essentially the most preposterous side of the NYT’s article is the belief that “laborious energy” is navy energy and that navy energy is unbiased of financial energy. Germany’s solely energy was its economic system. Washington has taken that away by blowing up the Nord Stream Pipeline and by forcing Germany to desert profitable enterprise offers with Russia.
With Germany becoming a member of Britain in conflict discuss Russia, it’s Washington pulling the puppet strings. In the end Europeans will determine that it’s NATO, not Russia, that can carry conflict to Europe.
